Grand Papua Hotel in Port Moresby |
In
recent times a British newspaper had scandalized Papua New Guinea as a land of
cannibals with insatiable appetites for European tourists.
In
PNG, it seems, the kind of tourism promoted is about quality tourism, which promotes
its diverse cultures and heritage. At the same time such an approach safe guards
the identities of its unique cultural heritage.
Tourism
in Papua New Guinea has developed around the quality tourists rather
than the mass tourists because of the need to give people a greater
opportunity to develop effective communication and dialogue between tourists
and the local community (Cashman 1987: 28-29).
It
has been observed that so often “when tourists travel together as a group they
can be insulated that they never develop an understanding of the hopes and
aspirations, the fears and problems of the local people in whose midst they are.”
An example of this observation is captured in the film Cannibal Tours featuring a group of European tourists visiting the
Sepik River of Papua New Guinea. By making the trip to the Sepik River the
tourists come the realization is that they are as strange as the people of the
Sepik.
Papua
New Guineans expect respect from tourists in order to welcome them into their
communities: “The tourists we want, the tourists we will respect and should go
out of our way to welcome are the tourists who come to us on equal terms, and
who are interested in us as a people.” (Cashman 1987: 28). In many Papua New Guinean communities the type
of tourists welcomed by the communities are those who are willing to live and
learn the cultures of the host communities. Such tourists are ones who
appreciate and value other people and their cultures.
In
an interesting article published in the Paradise Inflight With Air Niugini magazine,
Steven Mago (2006: 56) recounts one particular trip made by a Japanese tour
group to Aibom village in the Sepik River: “The programme at Aibom include a
visit to a village where visitors mingled with locals to learn about their
traditional lifestyle, a visit to the local school where the visitors spent an
hour teaching Aibom children “origami”, a pottery demonstration and pottery
making by the group. Despite the bad road experience, the trip to Aibom was a
memorable one for our visitors. Not only did they come to visit the site of the
famous art of Sepik pottery; there was also an exchange of values and cultures
through the teaching sessions at the local school and a tea ceremony held in
the village to mark the formal end of the tour.”
Exchange
of cultures and values are important end results of quality tourism. It also
highlights the respect tourists and host communities have of each other. The
story of these Japanese tourists to the Sepik River community of Aibom village
is a fine example in Papua New Guinea. There are other examples of Japanese
tourists visiting places like Rabaul and the Sepik to see War Memorial sites to
honour their relatives and brethrens who fought in the Second World and died in
Papua New Guinea.
One
of the largest campaigns in recent years that is attracting a lot of
Australians to Papua New Guinea is the Kokoda Trail in the Owen Stanley Range,
between Oro and Central Province. For the Australians the Kokoda Trail
symbolises their part in the Second World War. Massive publicity in the
Australian media, television, newspapers, magazines, and in sports, education,
and political circles has influenced more Australians to visit the Kokoda
Trail.
Yet
for the Papua New Guineans, the Kokoda Trail or other war memorial remains only
a symbol of another era transposed into a new opportunity or a nightmare. The
economic returns to local communities and the emergence of greater
understanding between Papua New Guineans and Australians or Japanese is
therefore the opportunity.
Tourism
is an industry that has both positive and negative side effects. Professor H.
Peter Gray (1987: 17) provides the following observations: “Before considering
the costs and benefits of tourism as an important sector in any developmental
plan, three things need to be made explicit. First, I treat tourism as I would
treat any other export-oriented industry: it should be considered as an
alternative to copper mining, textile manufacture or any other export-oriented
activity. The approach assumes that the developing economy faces a serious
shortage of foreign exchange and that this shortage represents a drag on the
development process.”
Grey
goes on to explain that the tourism industry depends on the existences of some
attraction for visitors. Papua New Guinea has many such attractions in natural
beauty, diverse cultures, languages, and historical sites: “The key to tourism
is the quality, the location and the perception by foreigners of that natural
asset…the basic appeal of a touristic location is the fundamental
characteristics of its natural attribute” (Gray 1987: 17). The two kinds of
tourism, according to Gray are “resort (sunlust)” and “wanderlust tourism”,
where “resort “sunlust” tourism…relies upon the climate, beaches, mountains and
doing at touristic site what can be done less well at home; wanderlust tourism
involves doing something abroad which cannot be done at home” (1987:
17). Distinguishing sharply between these two kinds of tourism is difficult. No
tourism centre is wholly and exclusively resort tourism or caters uniquely to
wanderlust. Centres of wanderlust make every effort to provide visitors with
those features, which resorts emphasize: comfortable accommodation, idylic
location, good food, local diversions and opportunities for sport and
relaxation.
In Papua New Guinea tourism has helped to
revive cultural reawakening of cultural heritage as part of tourism
development, which increases the demand for historical cultural exhibits, which
provides opportunities to support preservation of historical artefacts and
architecture. The positive result of this is that greater understanding and
awareness is created.
By learning more about others, their
differences become less threatening and more interesting. At the same time,
tourism often promotes higher levels of psychological satisfaction from
opportunities created by tourism development and through interaction with
travellers.
Comments
Post a Comment