Papua
New Guinea has contributed to the world knowledge in science, literature,
anthropology, medicine, law, and music, arts, and culture. So often we are slow
in acknowledging our intellectual and knowledge contributions to the world,
perhaps because we ourselves have been slow in saying so or we just don’t care.
In
so far as I am concern we need to acknowledge the contributions our societies and
people have made to world knowledge and development of our understanding of the
world, as we know it today.
As a
Papua New Guinean writer I have such a responsibility to tell the world about
Papua New Guinea, its people, its social and cultural way of life, and its
knowledge systems. With it comes also the responsibility to make Papua New
Guineans become aware of the importance of their own societies and the
contributions each society has made to the world.
It
is often said that Papua New Guinean societies have been ‘overwritten’ or ‘over-described’
in the books, analogues, and travelogues, and scientific volumes of the
world. It is true our societies have
been the subject of rigorous intellectual and scientific investigations, since
the arrival of Europeans on our shores. It continues even today.
It
fascinates me to participate in that creative dialogue and intellectual
stimulations that some of these studies have made to our understanding of
ourselves, more so to the point of recognizing how little we ourselves have
done to write about ourselves in journals and books.
I
was having a writer’s block in the last few weeks, but thanks to Peter
Demerath’s book, Producing Success: The
Culture of Personal Advancement in an American High School (2009),
published by the University of Chicago Press, USA.
Dr.
Demerath is an associate professor in the Department of Organizational
Leadership, Policy, and Development at the University of Minnesota, USA.
Dr.
Demerath and his family were on their way to Pere village in Manus Province,
last year when he presented a copy of his book to me. It was a wonderful gesture to have the visit
of Dr. Demerath, his wife Dr. Ellen, and daughters, Olivia and Sophia since the
first time I met them in Minnesota, when I served as a visiting professor in
English at the University of Minnesota in 2007-2008.
The
Demerath family had also been kind enough to invite my family over to dinner at
their home in St. Pauls, in addition to making sure my children got to know
their children in that short span of time.
Reading
Dr. Demerath’s book, Producing Success,
I was struck with the inspiration that a Papua New Guinean society has been the
source of inspiration for this impressive book.
In
his own words, Dr. Demerath says that the “comparative perspective that runs
throughout the book has been generated largely by my ongoing relationship with
the people of Manus Province, Papua New Guinea.”
Dr.
Demerath adopts a cross-cultural view of his study of the culture of personal
advancement in an American High School, with that of his experience in Pere
village, Manus Province.
“On
the face of it, it would be hard to imagine two societies that have less in
common: the inhabitants of Pere are relatively poor subsistence fisherpeople
who are struggling to achieve a measure of economic development with little
outside support.”
Dr.
Demerath knows from his long-term relationship with his adopted family in Manus
that Pere village ways and life are so diametrically different to those in a
small affluent town in the United States.
I
sure admire Dr. Demerath’s honesty and sensitivity in dealing with the
difference there is. He writes:
“However, one of the guiding principles of
anthropology is that we know best about something when we can see it in a
comparative perspective: comparisons throw the cultural basis of specific belief
or actions into sharp relief, thereby enabling us to locate ourselves relative
to other groups, and ultimately identify potential prospect for change…It is in
this way that anthropologists frequently use comparison to ‘make the familiar
strange and interesting again.’”
Dr.
Demerath recounts the discussion he had with a young sixteen-year old Pere boy
in May 1985. The boy had told Dr. Demerath about how hard it was to be in
school in Manus, more particularly about the boy’s anxieties about not getting
any employment after school.
“Most
likely, he said, he would end up going back to his home village, becoming a
subsistence fisherman, and trying to “come up good” so that he could pay back
the hard work that his parents had put into raising him. I had heard other
students say similar things, and I sympathized and said I understood.”
To
his surprise, the boy asked one important question that would have an impact on
Dr. Demerath’s perspective forever.
“Then,
surprisingly, he looked at me and said, “Peter, what do you want to do with
your life when you go back to America?” During the ten months I had been there,
none of the students had asked me that. “Well,” I said, “I think I want to
teach, and try to get a job at a university, and maybe write a book someday.”
“Ah,” he said nodding. “So you want to be somebody.”
At first I wasn’t sure what he meant. But then, after reflecting for a few
moments, I said, “Yes, I think I do.”
That
seems to have remained ingrained in Dr. Demerath’s mind and charted his
subsequent journey out of graduate school and into the academic environment of
teaching, research, and publications.
In
some sense the writing of this book has given Dr. Demerath the opportunity to
explain to the world his experiences in Manus and in the United States of
America.
Dr.
Demerath acknowledges the inspiration Margaret Mead, who had also done research
on childhood, socialization, and social change between 1928 and 1974, had on
his own research in Pere village.
Dr.
Demerath’s excellent book, Producing
Success, is intended for educators, students, and parents, as well as for
anthropologists, sociologist, and other social scientists.
Comments
Post a Comment